[
] 47
Indonesia: improving investment
in communities for risk reduction
Sugeng Triutomo, Deputy Chief for Prevention and Preparedness, National Agency for Disaster Management, Indonesia
O
n Tuesday 26 October 2010 at 5.02 p.m. local time,
Merapi Volcano in Yogyakarta, Indonesia spewed out
clouds of pyroclastic materials (fluidized rocks and
gases). This marked the beginning of a series of eruptions of
varying intensities that lasted until mid-November and consti-
tuted the biggest volcanic event in 140 years. The 2010 eruption
differed from earlier ones in that it featured a vertical explo-
sion that ejected pyroclastic materials up to 7.5km high. Also,
although pyroclastic flow from Merapi usually only covers
areas around 4-5km from the peak, this time it travelled more
than 14km downstream. The eruption was estimated to have a
volcanic explosivity index (VEI) of 4.
Fortunately, the Center for Vulcanology and Mitigation of Geological
Hazards (PVMBG), the national institution tasked with managing
volcanic and other geological hazards, had ordered evacuation for
all people living in areas under 10km from the peak, starting from
25 October at 6 a.m. local time. Although the majority of people
living close to the mountain could be evacuated in time, thanks to
an existing early warning system and the courageous and tireless
efforts of emergency volunteers, the eruption claimed 386 lives and
made hundreds of people homeless. The damage and loss caused
amounted to around Rp4.23 trillion (about US$470 million).
1
With more than 300,000 people living in sub-districts directly
on its borders, Merapi is the most densely populated volcano in
the country. It is not surprising therefore that it has attracted much
attention from the central and regional governments, and from
scientists as well as non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and
community-based organizations (CBOs). Merapi is the first volcano
in Indonesia to benefit from a multi-stakeholder management group,
Forum Merapi, which brings together regional and local govern-
ments, academics, NGOs and CBOs to jointly implement disaster
risk reduction (DRR) programmes and activities. Merapi is also the
most researched volcano in Indonesia since the Dutch colonial era.
Still, after all these scientific endeavours and DRR initiatives, the
impact of the 2010 eruption cannot be considered as insignificant.
Grappling with lost development gains
Indonesia is a country struggling with the effects of many disasters.
The damage and loss caused by the Indian Ocean Aceh tsunami
of 2004 amounted to around Rp48 trillion. The Central Java and
Yogyakarta Earthquake of 2006 caused damage and loss costing
Rp29.1 trillion. Subsequent disasters include the Pangandaran
tsunami of 2006 (Rp1.3 trillion); the Jakarta Flood of 2007 (Rp5.2
trillion); the West Sumatra earthquake of 2009 (Rp21.6 trillion); the
Wasior flood of 2010 (Rp0.28 trillion); and the Mentawai tsunami
of 2010 (Rp0.35 trillion). The combined damage and
loss suffered by the country between the Aceh tsunami
and the latest Merapi eruption will amount to more
than Rp110 trillion (equivalent to US$12.2 billion).
2
Together with other smaller scale disasters in the same
period that were not so well documented, the total may
exceed Rp150 trillion (around US$16.6 billion). This
is a substantial sum of money for a developing country
like Indonesia.
Disasters have deprived Indonesia of many hard-won
development gains. With global climate change, increased
hydrometeorological-related hazards will further exac-
erbate the situation. Figure 1 shows the distribution of
disasters and victims per type of incident from 1815 to
2011.
3
It can be seen that in Indonesia, hydrometeorolog-
ical disasters predominate. Also, the economic damage
caused by climate-related events is worse than that that
caused by geological and biological disasters, particu-
larly if we consider that wildfire disasters are closely
related to climate change. Data from the United Nations
International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR)
show that from 1980 to 2008, Indonesia suffered a total
economic loss of US$21,219,450,000. The biggest cause
was wildfire (US$9,329,000), followed by earthquake
and tsunami (US$8,962,726), flood (US$2,372,789) and
volcano (US$344,190).
4
Besides the large number of lives already lost and
properties damaged by disasters, Indonesian people
still face risks from multiple hazards. UNISDR statis-
tics show that in terms of human exposure, for tsunami
Indonesia ranks first out of 265 countries, with
5,402,239 people exposed; for landslide it ranks first
out of 162 countries, with 197,372 people exposed; for
earthquake it ranks third out of 153 countries, with
11,056,806 people exposed; for flood it ranks sixth out
of 162 countries, with 1,101,507 people exposed; and
for drought it ranks thirty-sixth out of 184 countries,
with 2,029,350 people exposed.
5
In terms of economic exposure, for tsunami, Indonesia
ranks fifth out of 265 countries, with US$3.46 billion in
GDP potentially lost to tsunami-related disaster events;
for earthquake, it ranks eleventh out of 153 countries,
at US$79.13 billion; for landslide, it ranks eleventh out
of 162 countries, at US$0.84 billion; and for flood, it
ranks twentieth out of 162 countries, with US$1.05
billion in GDP potentially lost.
6
2011




