Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  136 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 136 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 134

The way ahead

International Financial Institutions such as the World Bank and

Asian Development Bank should consider allocating a certain

percentage of their relief and development budget for disaster risk

reduction in schools of hazard-prone countries.

The International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent

Societies, being one of the oldest humanitarian movements having

physical presence in many countries, should encourage its national

chapters to demand safety from school authorities and develop

national action plans to work with vulnerable schools.

ISDR is situated at the core of the UN system to develop global

risk reduction strategies, and can influence other UN agencies such

as UNESCO, UNDP and national governments. ISDR is best placed

to build on its own global campaign and other initiatives in devel-

oping countries to further integrate safety issues in ongoing

programmes on HIV/Aids, climate change adaptation and good

governance. In addition to developing strategies, capturing lessons

and promoting best practices, ISDR should focus more on support-

ing pilots and demonstration projects on the ground.

National governments should undertake nationwide school safety

audits backed up with resources to implement recommendations and

safety measures identified by such audits. National governments must

also promote and integrate disaster risk reduction in school curricula

at various levels.

Private sector insurance companies should inspire their policy-

holders to demand certificates of school safety from their respective

education authorities. Authorities should certify if the school is safe

and prepared for any possible disaster risk. Once such a demand is

built, schools and governments are bound to act. The insurance sector

has the resources and the weight to take the lead. As in politics or

economics, progress will follow the law of demand: let policyholders

create a demand for protecting children at school.

8

Similarly, construc-

tion firms and contractors must provide a certificate of safety after

completing a school building or retrofitting old buildings.

Civil society organizations should directly engage with

and support vulnerable schools in learning and imple-

menting risk reduction measures through demonstration

projects, influencing government policies, and introduc-

ing programmes to integrate risk reduction for children.

A world without poverty is not possible without the

poor having access to education, to schools – indeed, to

safer schools. The poor have the right to life: the life of

their children and the life of their children in schools.

School safety is not possible without scientific awareness.

Safety and poverty removal are not two separate issues.

HFA priority:

Ensure that disaster risk reduction is a

national and local priority with a strong

institutional basis for implementation.

Identify, assess and monitor disaster

risks and enhance early warning.

Use knowledge, innovation and education

to build a culture of safety and resilience

at all levels.

Reduce the underlying risk factors.

Strengthen disaster preparedness for

effective response at all levels.

Safer Schools campaign application

Opportunities for disaster risk reduction through safer schools initiatives are synthesized into publication

and disseminated on local, national and regional levels. In its direct work with local communities, the

Safer Schools Campaign assesses human resource capacities and promotes community participation.

The Safer Schools campaign works with partner institutions in their respective states to identify disaster-

affected and vulnerable schools. School Safety Audit has been conducted to identify specific needs in a

representative sample of India’s vulnerable schools. School Safety training strengthens local capacities

for identifying hazards and reducing risks.

The Safer Schools campaign is imparting knowledge through education directly to school staff, or to local

trainers working directly with school staff, to build a culture of safety by spreading scientific awareness.

The campaign works in partnership with local governments and civil society agencies, thereby involving a

broad range of institutions in building a culture of safety on many levels.

In addition to assistance in the identification of risk factors, the Safer Schools campaign works to reduce

those factors. Structural improvements are made to buildings when resources allow, and innovative

plans such as disaster and accident microinsurance are used to reduce risk for students, teachers and

their families.

School Safety training sessions promote preparedness tools and strategies in schools. Supported

schools are also provided with fire extinguishers, first aid kits and IEC displays. Case studies have shown

that children extend preparedness strategies to their families, including lessons on what to do before,

during and after disasters.

How can the HFA framework comply with Safer Schools campaign activities?

Source: All India Disaster Mitigation Institute (2008). “School-based Disaster Risk Reduction: Lessons for South Asia”

www.southasiadisasters.net

A student presenting a risk assessment for his school during School

Safety training by AIDMI and the European Union in Kutch. Active

participation of students in designing school safety measures ensures

their better response during emergencies

Image: AIDMI. School safety training 2005