Previous Page  92 / 208 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 92 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 92

E

nvironment

:

air

,

water

,

oceans

,

climate

change

farmer said of the MASIPAG training: “It widened my vision and

knowledge in terms of the role of local rice seeds for farmers.”

Meanwhile, network partners have shared how these initiatives have

helped them build capacity to upscale BEA initiatives at the local

level and empowered local communities to do better.

The capacity-building activities have facilitated the upscaling of BEA

practices; built BEA skills among farmers, non-governmental organi-

zation (NGO) staff, agricultural extension workers and others; and

supported local action and network building. Collectively, the activities

have significantly contributed to the sustainable human development of

small rice farming communities in various countries in Asia.

In 2009, the rice fields of Yunnan, China, were destroyed by the

rice plant hopper and we collaborated with our network partner

in Yunnan, the Pesticide Eco-Alternatives Center (PEAC), to

address the situation. A short study was carried out, followed by a

cross-country workshop on the results, involving NGOs, academ-

ics, scientists and policymakers from China, Vietnam, Lao PDR

and Burma. In addition, we produced factsheets on the rice plant

hopper and Integrated Pest Management. All these efforts were

timely responses by PAN AP and PEAC to the crisis, to convince

agriculturalists and policymakers that the use of pesticides actually

exacerbates rice plant hopper attacks and is unsustainable, whereas

BEA methods are effective and sustainable in dealing with pests.

Fact-finding missions on displacement and land-grabbing

As part of its continued support of small producers in their strug-

gle for livelihoods and sustainability, including rights over land

and other productive resources, PAN AP has been organizing

international fact-finding missions (FFMs) to some countries

where communities were being forcibly displaced from produc-

tive land to enable the building of power plants or

industrial and mining projects.

In a successful intervention, PAN AP organized an

international FFM to Sompeta in Andhra Pradesh, India

in September 2010. Local communities were resisting a

planned coal-based power project which was to be built

on 779 hectares of lush farmland that the Government

had declared ‘wasteland’. The FFM documented the

plight of the farming communities and the problems

of displacement and loss of livelihood for about 20,000

small farmers. The likely impact of the project and the

paradox of unsustainable development could be best

summed up in the words of Sheshamma, an elderly

local woman: “Who will enjoy electricity in our villages

when we will be begging on the streets in big cities?”

Based on the FFM report, PAN AP mounted an inter-

national online campaign and also sought interventions

from United Nations Special Rapporteurs. With strong

local protests and international pressure building up,

India’s National Environmental Appellate Authority

denied environmental clearance to the project, which

was then scrapped in June 2011, saving the land and

livelihood of the communities.

PAN AP also supported communities fighting

displacement from land acquisition for mining in the

Philippines when, in November 2008, it exposed the

destructive oil and gas exploration projects in Tañon

Strait on the island of Cebu. The project was spear-

headed by Japan Petroleum Exploration Co. with

support from the local government. Tañon Strait was

declared a protected seascape by the Philippines as early

as 1998, and is a migration route of whale sharks. In

addition, the exploration project prevented the local

communities from having access to the sea, thus violat-

ing their rights to decent livelihoods. As a result of the

FFM and the campaigns that followed, the company

withdrew the project and the exploration was stopped.

Making a difference

PAN AP has been working with organizations and groups

of small farmers, agricultural workers, rural women,

indigenous peoples and other marginalized groups to

take up the challenge to ensure a healthy environment,

safe food, and food security and sovereignty. We have

realized that we cannot work in isolation and that we

must see this struggle within the framework of human

rights and environmental sustainability. This has meant

that PAN AP not only confronts dependency on pesti-

cides and chemical agriculture, but also supports people’s

rights to produce food ecologically and to have access

to productive resources such as land, water, biodiver-

sity and seeds. There is a need to organize and mobilize

support from a wide range of people to champion food

sovereignty and ecological agriculture and to show that

alternatives to pesticides exist. Our greatest strength

and most powerful resource is the network of people’s

organizations, particularly of marginalized communities

that also represent diverse movements and organizations.

Together we can make a difference.

PAN AP works with marginalized groups to ensure food security and a healthy environment

Image: PAN AP